Jan
08

asterisk Mine, again asterisk

After four years, I finally reclaimed my domain name from the Russian pornographers and cyber-squatters. It’s nice to have it back.

There was once a pretty good blog, here. Reading back through it, I’m sorry I stopped doing it. A lot of people read it, and it was nice to have that way to communicate with people.

I’ve taken down most of the entries. I’m not quite so comfortable as I once was with revealing things about myself on the internet – actually, I was never that comfortable with it.

What’s left is stuff that I felt had some permanent value – and a few things that made me laugh. A few things, like the older archives, would take more effort to recover than I’m willing to put in at the moment.

I don’t have any immediate plans to do anything with this blog, but I’ve learned never to say never, when it comes to blogging.

Added – August 8th, 2012 -I have completely rebuilt the blog using WordPress. I decided to go back to my original Igor/Worker Poster design for it. It’s not as pretty as the art nouveau one, but it made me nostalgic. Some day when I have time I’ll rebuild that design, too, and then I can swap back and forth between them thanks to WordPress’s themes function.

Thank god for the Internet Archive, which kept my old graphics, CSS and blog posts for all this time, all of which I lost a long time ago. I have re-added selected posts back to the start of 2004.

I still don’t have much desire to write on here at the moment – but it’s nice to have this old thing, completely rebuilt and modernized in WordPress, sitting here waiting for the day when I have something new to say.

Jul
02

asterisk Working in a call centre asterisk

At three in three afternoon I go to my call centre job. I’ve been doing this most afternoons for the last few weeks. My call centre is run by a company that contracts out to charities; they professionally raise funds. As the perky trainer explained on my first day, “Of course charities could do this themselves, in-house, with volunteers. But what they’ve found is that they can generate more revenue by hiring us. We’re the professionals at this.”

I’m morally ambivalent about this job. It’s better than selling aluminium siding or Florida holidays, but there’s a lot here that make me uncomfortable: the idea of outsourcing charitable donations, the profit-taking and wages, the guilt-trippy high-pressure tactics I am forced to use, the inhumanly mechanised nature of the operation.

I keep having these moments where something happens, something quite normal for here, and it strikes me as surreal. I blank for a moment, I feel a wild anxiety, and this line comes into my head:

What the fuck am I doing here?

*

I go to my desk. Adam hands me a stack of call sheets. There are 153, and I have to count and sign for them. At the end of my shift they will be counted again by somebody senior to me: a supervisor, a trainer. Should there be 152, I will be fired. You can also be fired for looking at a mobile phone in the office, or making a personal call. Security is taken very seriously, here.

I start dialling numbers. I am working on “Amnesty International Upgrades”. This means I call people who donate on a monthly basis to Amnesty International, and I try to get them to raise their donations by guilt-tripping them. To do this I tell them the story of The Rape of Aisha. The Rape of Aisha was a horrific event that happened in Somalia last year – Aisha, a 13-year-old girl, was raped by three men. The local Wahaabist militia, a seriously unenlightened bunch, then stoned Aisha to death for adultery. Nice. I remember reading about this at the time and being horrified. But by now I have told the story of The Rape of Aisha too many times. At least once each shift I remind myself that it is still a horrific event that happened to a real person. But it has become performance. I pause dramatically at certain moments. And new details have crept into the story along the way. Now, everybody in my “team” refers to Aisha as a “13-year-old schoolgirl”, and she was attacked “while walking home from school one day”. This wasn’t in the original reports, which were not even that definitive about her age. But I’m the only person here who has read the original reports. I know it’s a distortion, but I say it anyway, the same as everybody else.

It could be worse. I could be on WSPA signups. There, they call people who foolishly signed a petition and try to convince them to become regular donors by going on about bear-baiting and the like. At least the people I call are active supporters of Amnesty, and are sometimes interested; the WSPA signups are practically cold-calls, and people really don’t appreciate being told that shit, then asked for money. I hear it’s brutal.

But only a small part of my time is given over to re-telling The Rape of Aisha. Mostly what I do is call numbers and get no response. The call sheets I have been given suck, because Adam doesn’t like me. I think he senses I don’t like him. For a while it seemed like he liked me, or at least thought I might work out. For a while I was getting some clean sheets in with my junk. The clean sheets haven’t been dialled before, and it is easy to get people on the line and talk to them. You need to get six people on the line and talk to them each hour. This is easy with clean sheets, but now I am getting dreck again.

These numbers have been dialled six, seven times. These people don’t want to talk to me. They have worked out by now that it is Amnesty International trying to get them to increase their donations. They are irritated by the daily calls. They see the number come up on their mobile phones, and choose not to answer. They have told past callers to call their home numbers in the daytime, and their business numbers at night. They are always in meetings, or on the freeway, or just stepping out. They will not talk to you.

Of course, they could just say, “No. I will not increase my donation.” But they prefer to give an excuse, or avoid the call, and the callers are happy to let them give an excuse. Because if they give a firm “No,” well – that’s a negative. That fucks up your stats. So everybody prefers the fiction of, “I’m busy, now – try me tomorrow. On my home number. During the day.” And you dutifully note that down on your sheet.

Of the six people I am theoretically supposed to speak to, 2.4, or forty percent, must agree to upgrade their monthly subscriptions. This is your conversion ratio. My conversion ratio is good! I hit a high of sixty-five percent on one shift, but it has declined since then, and now sits around fifty percent. My calls were taking too long, which meant my “connects” – the number of people I speak to in an hour – were too low. So I cut my spiel back, and consequently my conversion ratio took a hit.

There is a lot of crap about Somalia and the United Nations in the official spiel, but nobody does the official spiel. It would take ten, fifteen minutes to get through all that. You reduce it to its essentials, then wing it. You rush through the Somalia and United Nations shit, because nobody cares. You dwell on Aisha. You don’t rush The Rape of Aisha. Aisha brings the big bucks. People don’t care about the logical connection between that, Amnesty International, and the United Nations. They just want to feel they’re doing something to stop 13-year-old schoolgirls being raped and stoned to death on their way home from school.

What the fuck am I doing here?

*

I am OK at this job. People give me money, when I can talk to them.

I’m not great at this job. John is great. John is my hero. John is from Northern Ireland, he speaks slowly and his voice is full of warmth. John’s conversion ratio is seventy percent. People love to speak to him. He hits the same sentences every call, and there is not a wasted word in them. When he first speaks to somebody he is full of warmth, then he charmingly asks for two minutes of their time. And they are happy to give two minutes to John. He starts with a few sentences on the suppression of journalists in Somalia. Somehow when John tells of this it sounds tragic, yet when I do it, it’s boring. He then gives The Rape of Aisha. His voice is full of sorrow and sympathy. He goes for his “first ask” – he always knows the perfect amount of money to request. Should he somehow overreach, he saves it with his “second ask” – and of course they can find that extra five dollars a month for John.

John raises three thousand, four thousand dollars a shift. My high-point was $1800, and that was a freak day with forty clean sheets. John gets nothing but clean sheets.

John is an enigma. This place is full of extroverts; John keeps to himself. When he wins awards at weekly meetings, he seems embarrassed.

I want to be like John.

*

The “second ask”:

An email from my friend Kate: “Huh! I got one of those calls. I only give $25 a month, but I’ve been doing it forever and want to keep doing it, and if I up it, I might at some point cancel it. Longevity is better. I wonder if AI facor that in when they pressure people to up their monthly contribution? That they might later cancel it altogether?”

My reply: “Yes, Kate, I do understand. But firstly, what I’d say to you, Kate, is that understand that this doesn’t have to be permanent. If you do increase your contribution and then find you need to go back to $25, it’s absolutely no trouble, and we’re happy to do that. But what I’d say to you, Kate, is that even a small increase, even as little as $1.25 a week – $5 a month – from you and people like you, can make a huge difference, given the urgency of the situation. $1.25 a week – $5 a month – is that something which might be manageable for you, Kate???”

Kate: “Ahhh haha! you got me. If they called back I might consider it. Nick.”

The second ask is all about showing empathy, acknowledging the validity of the person’s reasons for not wanting to increase their monthly donations, then turning around and asking for more anyway. Excessive name repetition seems to help – I got that from John.

What the fuck am I doing here?

*

I am pitching to a supporter. I am in full flight. I am doing The Rape of Aisha.

I didn’t have this person’s interest at the start – as usual, my Somalia stuff just got a lot of disinterested “mmm-hmms,” but they perked up when I mentioned how the miltia, “instead of arresting the three men, turned around and arrested Aisha. They accused her of being an adulteress. This is a thirteen-year-old schoolgirl, rememeber, Susan, whose only crime was that she raped.” I then give the fate of Aisha. “She was stoned to death… by fifty men… in front of a stadium of 1000 people.” I pause. “I don’t know how you feel about that, Susan…” I pause again. People like to vent in their own way at this point. All is looking good, and I am pleased. This is a training call, and I know I’m being monitored by Liam.

I go into the build-up for my first ask. My voice is impassioned. I am gesticulating. I’m practically on my knees. I keep using the word “urgent” and repeating Susan’s name. I ask…

There is a pause. You can hear the conflict in people’s minds at this point. They don’t want to give more money, but they don’t want to say no, either. Finally Susan ventures an excuse – she supports lots of other charities.

I am understanding. I ask her, chattily, about the other charities she supports. She tells me a little. I say that of course we wouldn’t want her to stop giving to another charity for us. She feels relieved. She thinks she has convinced me, and that I am nice and understanding. “But Susan, what I would say to you, is that many of our supporters are passionate and give to many charities. And often they find they can’t afford a large increase in their donations. But at this point in time, even small increases – as little as $1.25 – blah blah blah.” I hit her with the second ask. Another pause. Who can say no to an extra five dollars a month? She isn’t happy about it, would never have volunteered it, but agrees anyway. I thank her profusely – feeling, as I always do, a little guilty. I give her a few moments of warmth, but this call has already gone on too long, and I need to get her off the phone. I wish her a great day; she thanks me. They usually do. My wild, atonal, slightly hysterical enthusiasm – they never ask me, as they sometimes do other people, if I’m being paid for this. I am so obviously a passionate volunteer, giving up his time to help out a charity he believes in.

I go for my review with Liam. My reviews are always the same these days, so I’ll tell you instead about the first review I had with Liam. It was on my first day of calling: I was still nervous, still fumbling, but I did manage to get the extra sixty dollars a year on my second ask.

“Come on, let’s have a chat,” Liam says. We go to the staff room. Liam is like many people who work here – mildly extroverted, some university education, good-looking, white, middle-class. These people have the sort of natural bonhomie to do well at this. I always get on fine with this type of person. Such people have usually lived relatively trouble-free lives, they are relaxed and comfortable with others, have uncomplicated internal lives, are rarely mean or malevolent in their motivations. It’s easy for me to get on with people like that. And I like Liam. But I rarely become good friends with such people. There tends to be a gulf of understanding that is mutually recognised.

“So, how do you think you’re going?” Liam says, brightly.

“Alright. I could do better,” I say.

Liam nods. “What do you think you’re doing well?” he asks.

“I’m slowing down,” I say. “I’m listening to John’s calls, and trying to do it more like him. I think I’m becoming more familiar with the material, and I’m engaging better with people. Making it more of a conversation, less of a sales pitch.”

“Yes, exactly,” Liam says. He looks down at his notes. I seem to have thrown him a bit. “That’s exactly what I was going to say to you,” he says, and repeats back what I’ve just told him. “Now,” he says, “is there anything you think you need to improve on?”

“Yeah,” I say. “Liam – my tone of voice sucks. It lacks modulation. Every sentence sounds the same, it’s sort of excited and flat at the same time, and I need to improve it.”

Liam looks really startled now. “Yes, again,” he says. “That’s what I was going to say to you.” He thinks. “What might you do to improve it?”

“I don’t know,” I say. “It’s a bit of a general problem in my life, actually. It’s one of the reasons I took this job.”

“Oh – give it a bit of a polish-up, huh?” Liam says. He seems more than a little confused by me.

I half-nod, half-shrug. There is a gulf of understanding. Hi, Liam, I’m Nicholas. I’m extremely self-aware; so much so that it is a bit of a problem for me. It makes me sensitive and conscious of the moods of others, probably excessively. I spend a lot of time second-guessing myself. I’m constantly monitoring myself and how people are responding to me. Mostly my self-assesment is accurate, but when it becomes divorced from an external reality strange ideas can bloom in my mind, become excessive, inaccurate, obsessive, harmful. It makes me a writer, makes me who I am, but often it makes me insecure as well. I don’t know how to do what you do, Liam – I don’t know how to just relax and assume everyone likes me. I’m introverted, I spend too much time in my head, and you know what else? I have a more-than-slight phone phobia when it comes to talking to strangers. I didn’t mention this in the interview. Perhaps it’s because I can’t see who I’m talking to; perhaps it’s just that I’ve indulged it, and not confronted it.

What the fuck am I doing here? But we’re getting a little closer to an answer to that question.

These days my training sessions with Liam tend to sound the same. He says, “Ah, your tone of voice is still no good, but it seems to be working anyway. Keep it up.” I think he’s dispirited. It’s true – what I do works, but not in the way it should. I speak too fast, I am full of babbling enthusiasm, I sound like a hopelessly sincere and committed university student volunteering his evenings – and people are impressed by this and give me money. And of course, I’ve learned short-cuts. I cheat. These days it’s all The Rape of Aisha and name repetition. That’s all I really know, all it’s about. It’s a long way from the artistry of John.

Liam’s right – it sucks, but it’s working, so what can you do? But I am not happy either.

I want to say to Liam, “Liam – where have you been all my life? Whatever they’re paying you, I’ll double it. Follow me around, watch me, listen to my conversations with people, then we’ll do reviews.” I imagine how these would go. Liam would say to me, “Yeah, you seemed engaged. You listen well, of course, and you said interesting things. They seemed to genuinely respond to you and enjoy your company. Now, what do you think needs improving?”

“My nervous half-smile?” I would venture.

Liam would nod. “Yes! And sometimes your laugh is a little nervous, too. It betrays you. And the body-language? It could be more open, less reluctant. But hey, they were laughing, they kept talking to you, obviously they liked you. Keep it up, good job.”

*

I’ve been having lots of epiphanies lately. Things came unstuck for me not so long ago. That was scary. It’s strange: I write here that I am a very self-aware person, and a year ago I would have said that I had a good understanding of myself. Yet over the last six months – gradually, then suddenly – I’ve come to see that in many ways my self-assesment has been shallow, unquestioning, awry. There were great confronting questions which I never thought about at all, because they made me anxious. And there were answers I thought I knew, understandings I thought clever, which turned out to be not-so-clever; that on closer examination turned out to be giant convoluted structures for coping with anxiety. They all toppled over at once, and my sense of self toppled with them.

I closed the bookshop about two years ago, now. At the same time I stopped writing this blog, and even my half-hearted attempts last year were not the same. I haven’t written anything particularly personal on this blog for a long time.

I thought at the time that it was a good idea to draw a curtain across my life. I felt overexposed. I thought that closing the bookshop would be good for me, that it would give me time to write and think, but it gave me far too much time. I made my life so perfectly safe, but looked at another way, I indulged in every fear I had, large and small. And I drew a curtain across it so nobody could see. And behind that curtain I distracted myself from my low-level unhappiness with rituals and elaborate imaginings and took comfort in my safety-from-fear, while in reality I became more introverted, more self-conscious, more self-doubting. I indulged bad habits – didn’t keep my place as clean as I should, didn’t eat as well as I should, smoked way too many cigarettes – and without realising it I was very careful with what I thought about, less I realise the trouble I was in. My excessive introversion affected my manner and confidence.

Epiphanies, a dalliance with the tenets of cognitive behavioural therapy, and then a rejection of some of it – I got gung-ho for a while, then decided that I didn’t want to adopt every thing. Didn’t want to dispense with some aspects of myself that were perhaps less-than-perfectly functional, but which made me creative, humorous, sensitive, ambitious. Still – epiphanies, and CBT, and between them I formed a conception of what I wanted to be. And that I will put down here – not my path to understanding, but the understanding itself. It’s not a bad thing to declare publically.

Put briefly: I want to confront every fear, until I am no longer afraid. And I want to change my thoughts from a raging mix of ill-controlled imagination, regret, self-doubt, and occasional insight into a concentrated and consciously directed stream of focused attention. I want a sort of controlled, creative derangement, when I need it; I want to be perceptive and sensitive and open to people and the world around me; I want the ability to be confidently and sociably in the moment with strangers and friends, with no more self-checking and inter-personal monitoring than is necessary to not act like an ass. I’ve said it before – understanding it, but not always knowing how to approach it, or why it sometimes seemed to move away from me – there is a me that feels like me. Hopefully it is still where I am headed, perhaps more consciously than before, and for sounder reasons. I feel a long way from it at the moment, but am determined to pursue it through practice and engagement with people and situations I might otherwise have avoided. I want to do small things well and with integrity, until those things accumulate and become habitual.

Does this explain why I’m working in an out-going call centre, pitching Amnesty International upgrades to strangers? Or am I just dressing up something mundane in glorious rags?

*

Everything here is measured statistically. At the start of each shift Adam comes across to me and we go through my stats.

Adam is the only person here I dislike; unfortunately, he is my supervisor. His flat affect and cold manner make me wary. There is something of the sociopath about him, and also quite a lot of the anal pinhead. He is English, and uses the word “mate” in that excessive way only English people living in Australia do. The statistics we are measured on are our connects – that is, the number of people we can get a yes or no from in an hour – the average value of our upgrades, our conversion rate – what percentage of people we can convince to upgrade – and our average income per hour. Adam has a little speech which he thinks is clever. He says, “I don’t care about income per hour. I think it’s a stupid statistic. Because – ” and here he pauses – “if you’re hitting your targets for each of the other categories, the income per hour will take care of itself.”

I don’t mind the statistics. They sit happily with the reasons I am here. Each time I speak to somebody on the phone I try to engage with them, focus, be pleasant and charming. I use the metrics – average upgrade and conversion rate – as a meaure of myself. My goals, and the call-centre’s, happily coincide. And I try to do the same with each real-world interaction, too – each small conversation I have with a co-worker. I don’t have metrics on my success with that, but my guess? About fifty, fifty-five percent. About the same.

For a while I seem to be progressing and doing well at this job. My income per hour is where it should be; my average upgrades are high, and so is my conversion rate. Each day I get better call sheets, which gives the statistical illusion of progress, although it is actually a fiction controlled by Adam.

But Adam is not entirely happy. I am not making enough connects. This is something I don’t give a shit about – it is about how fast you can dial, how quickly you can get people off the phone, how much of your ten-minute break you are willing to give up so that your statistics are acceptable. And more than anything, it is about the sheets you get – how called-out they are. Still, I’m mostly meeting my quota for income per hour, which I believe is the only measure that should matter when assessing job performance. Who cares by which path you get there?

But Adam gives me his little speech, and I make a mistake. I question him. I say to him, “Come on, Adam – surely there’s more than one road to Damascus. If I’m making less connects, but getting higher than average upgrades, then surely it doesn’t make any difference, so long as I’m making my money.”

Adam pauses; a look crosses his face as if a wire has come unsprung. “No,” he says definatively. “You need six connects an hour.” And he explains again about how if I hit each of these targets, my income per hour will take care of itself. I look at him. He looks at me. We don’t like each other.

This is a failed social interraction. A bad one. I stop getting clean sheets. Adam stops telling me, “You’re going to make it, mate.” I am fucked.

*

Here is how it theoretically should work: each team has its targets. Each member of that team has the same targets. The call sheets are handed out randomly. People who do well meet or exceed their targets. People who don’t, don’t.

Here is how it works in practice. The supervisors are under pressure from higher up to make sure their team hits its targets. So they do something sensible – they take the fresh, clean call sheets and give them to the best, most experienced callers. These callers then kick ass, smash their targets, and win weekly prizes. They give the bad, called-out sheets to the new people. The new people break their heart trying to meet targets that are impossible, because they can’t get anybody on the phone. Their supervisors advise them, “call faster,” as if this will solve the problem – because nobody will acknowledge the truth about the call sheets. If the new person seems to be making progress, they are gradually given better data; perhaps, dialling their asses off and hustling like crazy, they can last it out long enough to become relatively senior – about a month – and then they get given decent data. If they don’t seem to make progress, or their supervisor doesn’t like them, they are given dreck until they are eventually told that they are not meeting their targets and are let go, or until they break down and quit. Unfortunately, I figure all this out too late.

Turnover in this place is massive. Every day there are three or four new trainees – and presumably, three or four people gone from the day before. The five people with whom I started become three. Then one wigs out, mid-shift. This happens a bit. I don’t blame him. He’s doing the call-sheets I had the day before, and I felt like killing myself. He turns them in to Adam, declares “This isn’t for me,” and leaves.

There is just me and this one other guy left from my incoming group. I chat with him outside. “I think I’m getting fired tomorrow,” he says. “I’m not meeting my targets.”

“I think I might be as well,” I say. “Don’t quit. Make them fire you.” I am talking to myself.

*

John sits across from me. He is on the phone relating The Rape of Aisha. He looks over to me. I do a supercillious impression of serious concern. I nod, my eyebrows furrowed. He relates a shocking detail. My eyebrows shoot up and I do a little pantomime of aghast amazement. The corner of John’s mouth twitches. He looks away. He doesn’t want to burst out laughing during The Rape of Aisha.

I smile to myself, although I wanted him to laugh. But John is too good at this job for that. Meanwhile I can’t get anybody on the phone. I keep dialling. It is all very Glengarry/Glenross.

*

At the end of our shift, John asks me if I want to get some pub food, have some drinks. I say sure. I am surprised. John is my hero! The only person I’ve met in this place whom I genuinely admire.

We go to the corner pub, have some food, a few beers, talk. We get on well. I’d forgotten this about myself, though I used to expect it. I’d forgotten that when I liked somebody in a group situation like this, that I usually became friends with them. It seems a small miracle to me, until I remember. How have I got to this point, to no longer expect that people will enjoy my company?

John is a traveller, I guess he doesn’t know many people in the city. I don’t think we’re going to become best mates, but we get on well, the conversation flows easily, we talk about work, travel, writing, lots of things. John seems to think I’m amusing and intelligent. I feel better about myself than I have in a while.

*

The next shift I am given call-sheets that have been called so many times that there are no longer spaces in which to write the details of each call. The calls have spilled over beyond their allotted section on the form, they’re scrawled in gaps and margins.

Adam comes to review my statistics from the previous shift. He tells me I really need to hit one hundred percent on this shift. On every measure – not just money. Particularly, I need six connects an hour, which I have never achieved.

There is no way this can be done. I ask him how he thinks that will be possible. “Call faster,” he says. I ask him how the call sheets are assigned. He doesn’t answer; takes offense at the question. He tells me that he could call these sheets and get six connects an hour. He tells me he has to get on to other things.

I am fucked, and know it. For some reason – pride, maybe – I give it my best shot. I spend my shift dialling constantly. I fill in details while the phone is ringing; I skip breaks. I don’t make my connects, but somehow, scrounging desperately, giving my spiel in two minutes, guilt-tripping like a bastard whenever I can get a human voice on the line – I make my money, or close enough. It is a fucking miracle.

*

Towards the end of the shift, Adam tells me to gather my things. I follow him to the meeting room.

Adam tells me it’s not going to work out. He says I’m not a team player. “We need team-players here,” he says. “Questioning me about call-sheets, questioning me about connects…” He can’t fire me for not making my money, because tonight – somehow – I did. He is left with this. This is my tiny bit of pride.

“We don’t need to drag this out,” I say.

“Fine,” he says. He asks for my swipe-card back, which I give him.

I tell him, “I have to say, Adam – you’re not the most supportive boss I’ve ever had, either.”

“That’s your opinion, mate,” he says. I don’t rile him, though – his affect is still flat, he is coldly dispassionate.

I leave. I’m disappointed. This job was mostly horrible, but it was good for me for the moment, and in a strange way I was enjoying it. I never was planning to stick with it for long. Another month, no more. It was something to practice with, something to keep me occupied. I think I mostly succeeded by my personal measures, although I completely failed to charm Adam. I wonder if it is something self-destructive in me: that the one person with whom I never much tried to get on was the one who controlled my success or otherwise. Still – I think the phone phobia is permanently gone, even if I never did develop a polished telephone manner.

I have something much more ambitious planned for a month from now; the next stage of this journey, this excoriation of fear and self-doubt. I won’t say what it is just yet, because it’s still a bit up-in-the-air and I don’t want to jinx it – but hopefully it will happen, and if it does, there will be plenty to blog about.

Posted by Nicholas on July 2, 2009 | 2 Comments

Nov
24

asterisk My five best and worst gigs asterisk

I am flip-flopping on the question of the US bailing out its auto industry – this article from the New York Times scared the hell out of me. I am not going to stand resolute and Bushlike on free market principles while the global economy collapses. But I still hate the idea. Something needs to be done about companies that are “too big to fail”. My idea – I think it’s not a bad one – is that when a corporation becomes so large that its economy starts to resemble that of a developing nation, the IMF should come in and do an audit, as they do for developing nations.

But I don’t want to talk about the GFC today. I recently convinced my father to take me to see Leonard Cohen in January. This is good, as I couldn’t have justified the $145 ticket price for myself. If this review is anything to go on, it should be a special show. It will mark a milestone for me – he is the last of my musical heroes, excluding people who have died and bands that have broken up, that I am yet to see in concert.

I think after this show I could never see another gig and still feel satisfied that I saw the best bands and musicians of my time. There are plenty of things I wish I had done in my life that I didn’t do, but going to gigs has not been one (well, I still regret missing Summersault.) If I never see another gig I will still be able to tell my children, should I ever have them and should they have good taste in music, that yes, I saw all those people. (Contrast to my father, who spent most of 1965 in London and didn’t go see anybody. I’ve quizzed him about this. “Why not?!” I demand. He shrugs, looks sheepish, and says he was too busy drinking at pubs.)

I still love music, but over time I’ve become more passive about it. I’ve come a long way from the time when I would make special trips into Sydney to go to Waterfront and buy records based on their textaed sticker recommendations. These days I’m content to let others do the work for me, and will only check out a new band if a few people whose opinion I respect tell me I should do so. And I no longer care about good seats (or standing right at the front), or whether a band or person is “cool” or not. I guess it comes with getting older.

Anyway to celebrate my seeing of everybody I love I have compiled a list of my five best gigs, and as a bonus my five worst as well. In no particular order. The best ones first.

Tori Amos, State Theatre, 1994. The entire concert was just her and a piano, excluding two songs with tape backings – Cornflake Girl, which was kind-of dissapointing, and a cover of Prince’s Purple Rain, which was seriously amazing. If there is anything that all these gigs have in common, it is that in each there was no holding back – everything was given in the performance.

This concert did have one downside. I went with my father, who had picked up on my mid-nineties enthusiasm for Tori. And he had a cough. The audience was made up mostly of earnest young girls. All was fine until Tori launched into her a cappella song about being raped, “Me and a Gun”. And the whole place was all reverential silence. Except for my father, who coughed throughout the song. So it went, “There was me and a gun [cough cough] / and a man on my back [cough cough cough].” I hunkered down in my seat; I don’t know that I’ve ever been so mortified. I thought we were going to be set upon by angry young feminists.

I feel bad telling this story, when my dad has taken me to see so many concerts I could not have afforded myself. It wasn’t his fault, but it happened.

Bikini Kill, Wollongong Youth Centre, 1997. I went to a lot of great shows at the Wollongong Youth Centre, but this was by far the best. The Youth Centre used to be the Wollongong Art Gallery, and in high school our class was invited, along with other classes, to paint flags for it, which were then hung in the hallway. For some reason me and a bunch of my friends painted ourselves as horror movie characters; I was a small vampire. So it was always a little strange to go there and see this horror-movie depiction of myself hanging in the hallway.

The show: I was friends with Laurie, who was in the support band, and I helped him bring in his gear. Kathleen Hanna moved a guitar case out of the way and smiled at me! There were about 300 people in a room that could hold about 200, Bikini Kill seriously rocked and were all punk-rock meets Toni Basil. People kept calling for “Carnival”, and Kathleen Hanna demurred. She said it was an old song and they were over it, and instead we should all go form our own bands and cover it. Then they came back for a second encore, and played it. It was great.

Yeah Yeah Yeahs, Annandale 2004? I wasn’t a fan before the show – in fact I had to be pretty-much dragged to it by Bree. Since then I’ve listened to their big album a few times. It’s decent, but I don’t love it. But I’ve never seen a better rock show. Hard to say why; it’s a mysterious thing, when a band rocks so well that the entire audience is captured by it and transported somewhere. Commitment and intensity have a lot to do with it.

Jens Lekman supporting some lousy Candle Records act who I forget, Bulli Family Hotel 2005. A weird return for me to the pub where in 1990 I filmed a terrible horror movie, The Third Floor, with some friends. I’d never heard of Jens Lekman and went, I suppose, for the lousy Candle Records act I forget, and also because it promised to be a fun roadtrip back to my old stomping grounds with Tahlia and her friends. Jens performed solo, half the time accompanying himself on his ukulele or whatever-it-is, the other half a-cappella. Again, a performance of total mesmerising honesty. It is the only time I have ever been at a gig where, after the support act finished, half the audience immediatley stood up and went to buy his album. It started a long musical love affair with me and Jens.

Patti Smith supporting Bob Dylan at Wollongong Entertainment Centre, 1998. A really weird audience; it was the grand opening of the Entertainment Centre and most people seemed to be there to support the debut of a worthy Wollongong venture, or else because they liked Peter Paul and Mary’s covers of Bob Dylan back in the sixties. Anyway, Patti Smith was the support; me and a bunch of other people who were actually there for the music stormed the front of the stage, in the process severely pissing off the connected socialites of Wollongong who occupied the front-row seats. One snotty twenty-something in the front row kept hissing at us, “Please return to your assigned seats!” The security guards tried to clear us out and Patti Smith stopped the show and started arguing with them, saying she liked us there. They said it was a security issue; Patti asked us if we would show co-operation by sitting down for a song. Which we did. And she rocked out angry and hard, and then we stood up again, and it was great.

Bob was OK; I’ve seen him better. The lukewarm response of all the non-fans who were expecting a greatest hits package from a genteel folky ruined it a bit; it was Patti who made it one of my top five concerts.

Looking at the list in total, the most obvious question is, why are sexually liberated feminist rock chicks so prominent? It’s not really representative of my whole music collection. I have no idea.

Now, the five worst:

Sonic Youth, the Metro, 1998. I don’t know what I expected, but by the fifth 10-minute improvised feedback jam session I was wondering what crime I had committed to deserve dropping fifty bucks on this show. Some would call it genius; it sure did nothing for me.

Cat Power, Newtown RSL, 2001? Chan was doing a tour in which she played songs to accompany a silent film. Except the video player didn’t work, so there was no film. After the first song they gave up on the movie, and during the second, the lights guy turned the lights up on Chan, who was playing on a completely dark stage. She paused mid-song to snarl “Turn the fucking lights down, please!” So the rest of the show was Chan doing very slow, dreary piano ballads in the dark in a very noisy room. I think I lasted about an hour and a half of this before giving up and leaving.

Bob Dylan, State Theatre, 1992. I’ve been lucky enough to have seen The Bob five times. I’ve seen him great, awful, and indifferent. I saw one show where he sang like it was 1965, full-voiced and bending his notes and hitting the high ones with his triumphant sneer (it was the night after he won his Academy Award; perhaps he was happy.) I saw a show a couple of years back where he seemed completely drunk and spent most of the night trying to play piano solos which were far beyond his abilities as a pianist. But this show – the first time I saw him – was truly, memorably awful. He had a backing group that made every song sound identical, and mumbled so terribly that you frequently had no idea what he was singing. Songs went like this: [three minutes of screeching hard rock and mumbling] “Like a rolling stooone” [four minutes more of screeching hard rock and mumbling]. He also hardly faced the audience. During the depressed post-show analysis, the conversation went like this:

“I kind of liked Desolation Row.”

“He did Desolation Row?!”

“What was that song about buffalo?”

“What song about buffalo?”

“He said it was about buffalo before he started. I heard it clearly. He said, ‘This is a song about buffalo.’”

(Ohmygod! The web is amazing. 16 years later I can confirm he really did do a song about buffalo! And he did do Desolation Row, too, although not Like a Rolling Stone – that was a hypothetical example.)

Sebadoh, The Metro, 1999. Probably should have been a great show. The three songs I got to hear were certainly pretty good. Unfortunately I was talking to Mel beforehand in Alexander’s, and she had an abstract Swatch watch which she completely misread, so we missed almost the whole thing. They broke up a couple of months later.

Cat Power supported and backed by Mick Turner and Jim White of the Dirty Three, Thirroul Beaches, 1999. Yes, the worst concert of all time. It should have been one of the best.

I feel bad that Chan has two spots in my five worst concerts, particularly as she has such a reputation for giving bad shows. I should say that I’ve seen her 3 and ¼ times, and she’s only been bad once – the previously discussed Newtown gig. This was the ¼ time, and it wasn’t her fault.

I was so excited about this show! It was bizarre that it was even taking place. Back before Cat Power were huge, she did this tour of Australia with the two talented people from the Dirty Three. And for some reason, they were playing at a local pub near my home in Austinmer. It wasn’t a place known for gigs; it was taking place in a seriously tiny back room.

But somehow I missed the important piece of information that that it started – I don’t know why – at six thirty. So I got there at 8.30, expecting a great night, and caught two or three songs before the whole thing ended.

My friend – who hadn’t even been into Cat Power until I got her into them – was also there. And afterwards I went and saw her. She said, “You missed a great show, man.”

I asked what she was doing now – I was still ready for an evening. She said she was just going home.

So I went home, very disapointed with the evening.

The next time I saw my friend, she said to me, “Wow! You missed a great night the other night.”

“What do you mean?” I said.

“We stayed at the bar afterwards. And we were drinking with Chan and Mick and Jim!” (They were on first name terms, now, it seemed.)

“You were?!” I said.

“Yeah! And we stayed out with them really late. And guess what! After the bar closed, we all went to Austinmer pool. And we went midnight skinny dipping with Chan Marshall!”

“…”

“What’s the matter?”

“…”

Worst gig ever. I couldn’t listen to Cat Power for two years after that.

Anyway, what’s your best and worst?

Nov
03

asterisk I remember Goosey Goose asterisk

A long time ago, in the execrable year of 2002, while I was down at Austinmer, I returned from a walk on the beach one day and announced to my father, “There is some sort of weird bird in Austinmer pool.”

“It’s a goose,” he said.

The goose – known variously as Austin, Goosey, and Charles – had arrived on the beach some weeks before and had happily set up residence at the southern end of the beach, spending time in the pool and on the rock platform there. Contrary to its racial stereotype it did not appear foolish, but instead possessed, on the occasions I saw it, an austere and haughty dignity.

Its welfare was investigated by the RSPCA, who pronounced it a domestic goose or gander of undetermined sex. They had no explanation as to how it had arrived on the beach, but said it was healthy, and as it appeared happy, there was no reason to move it.

The goose was quickly and informally adopted by the local community. The Illawarra Mercury ran several stories on it, quoting local residents. John Roach gave insights on Goosey’s habits:

“It’s generally very placid, although when old Bill Redfern brought some bread and scraps down to it yesterday it got a bit feisty… It alternates between thinking its a seagull and a dog. One morning it’ll be standing among the gulls and the next it’ll be chasing them like a dog.” He also said, “Of a morning you see webbed footprints where it’s been goose-stepping up and down the beach.”

Locals looked out for the goose. A woman who ran a local takeaway store claimed to the Mercury that she fed it three times a day with goose food. (This woman was never so kind to customers, in my experience, so I’m not sure what to make of this claim.) Goosey provided a lot of happiness to a lot of people.

On the 10th of October, the Mercury reported that fears had been temporarily held for the safety of Goosey. One morning it was not in its usual place near Austinmer pool. It was soon spotted wandering the suburban streets of Austinmer. Concerned residents tried to shepherd it towards the relative safety of Glastonbury Gardens, but upon being approached Goosey took flight, and headed back to its usual digs near the pool.

Still, residents were becoming concerned – some thought Goosey had grown thinner in recent weeks.

Austinmer beach gets busy in the summer, and perhaps that plays a part in the mysterious fate of Goosey. On the 11th of December, the Mercury reported:

Austinmer Beach residents are mourning the loss of their pampered community pet, Goosey. His many mates fear a loathsome opportunist has swiped the handsome black and white bird for the Christmas buffet. Goosey (pictured) was last seen downing a peanut butter sandwich at the beach on Sunday afternoon … The Golyas have led a search party to nearby beaches but there have been no sightings.

Residents got together and offered a $400 reward for information leading to the whereabouts of Goosey. The Mercury reported that an unidentified person had seen Goosey being bundled into a car. It was popularly supposed that tourists – probably the much-despised Westies – were resposible.

Despite the reward, nothing more was seen of Goosey. On the web he exists in the collective consciousness in the form of a Myspace group – The Austi Goose Memorial Group, in a painting by artist Wendi Reis (reproduced below), and now in this blog post. It is probably foolish and sentimental to believe that a goose needs a permanent internet memorial, but nevertheless, I just wanted to say, I remember Goosey Goose.


Goosey in happier times

Oct
06

asterisk Worker Poster used in vodka ad asterisk

love how this font, which I knocked together really quickly about five years ago to make a heading for this blog, gets used by people. Check out this excellent use of it in a vodka ad:

The ad makes more sense when seen in a mirror:

Images from here, where the ad is discussed.

As usual, people complain that it’s not “real” Cyrillic. It’s not meant to be! It’s a post-modern pastiche, which is another way of saying I don’t read Cyrillic.

Oct
04

asterisk On mackerel as currency asterisk

This article from the Wall Street Journal explains how, since the phase-out of cigarettes in prisons, pouches of mackerel have become the de facto currency.

I see a few problems with mackerel as a unit of currency. The most obvious, as discussed in the article, is that mackerel bulks a lot. It seems prisoners’ lockers are starting to overflow with mackerel.

Another problem, I would think, would be inflation. According to the article, one of the reasons that prisoners like the mackerel as currency is that a pouch costs approximately one US dollar. Thus the currency is pegged against the greenback. But, as the article also mentions, nobody likes mackerel: “few – other than weightlifters craving protein – want to eat it.” The result of this would be that over time, the supply of mackerel in a prison would increase, causing inflation. The Mack would come to be valued at a discount to the greenback.

However, this inflation would not continue indefinitely, and prisoners would not end up hauling around mackerel by wheelbarrows. Eventually, Macks would fall to a point where it would be more rational for an inmate to eat his mackerel than to store it for future use as currency. Also, whatever the real value of the Mack, its nominal value would remain $1. That is the price at which prisoners would still have to purchase new Macks from the prison canteen. The subsequent disincentive to buy new Macks would thus help to control the money supply.

The next logical step would be a move to the Mackerel Standard. An enterprising prisoner – presumably one who already has power and prestige within the prison system – could set himself up as a bank. He could take deposits, and issue scrip to the effect that this piece of paper was equivalent to X Macks. He could then put his mackerel to work, probably in some sort of loan-sharking business.

There are some problems with this. One is that the bank would then start to accumulate mackerel pouches. Even with re-lending the money, the profits – in the form of bulky mackerel – would be difficult to handle. The banker, after all, cannot deposit his massive amounts of mackerel in an underground vault, and is constantly at risk of having his mackerel confiscated. No doubt some of the profits would be put back into the economy – as payment for thugs, etc – and some would be re-lent. However the banker would then be vulnerable to runs on his bank, as he would be unable to keep a sufficient supply of mackerels available to cover a run.

The solution here would be for the banker to make an arrangement with the prison canteen. The banker could exchange his mackerels for cash at a discount, and the canteen officer could then re-sell the pouches back to the inmates, thus making a profit. In return, the canteen officer would guarantee to supply the banker with mackerel in the event of a run.

Thus the canteen officer would become a Reserve Bank, the problem of bulky piles of mackerel would disappear, and scrip in the form of paper Macks would supplant actual mackerel pouches as the prison’s currency.

That’s my thinking, anyway. Of course the article says that due to an increase in the cost of mackerel, the value of the Mack is surging against the dollar. So what would I know?

Sep
26

asterisk Because asterisk

Tim recently wrote a post on his blog, which he has since removed. It was a list of reasons why he sometimes found it difficult to write his blog. I thought it was a nice post, but I can guess why he removed it; no doubt some part of it seemed somehow too personal, too revealing. (For the record he says he simply wasn’t happy with it, so I may have been over-interpreting there.)

Of course I can understand; I’ve complained about the same things myself. But here I am again regardless, and I suppose I should explain why. Why I’ve ressurected this blog; why now, after 18 months of not doing it, and also why it’s News Rants Soliloquies Reveries, with a new domain, but still my name on it, and not an anonymous blogspot blog somewhere.

So, following on from Tim:

It’s because I found myself trying to cram blog entries into my Facebook status updates. I would only have room for a single pithy observation, and I’d feel frustrated. I wanted to explain, and I wanted to use all my other pithy observations. I had hundreds.

It’s because it’s spring after such a long cold winter, and suddenly I’m full of energy and sociability.

It’s because I became a news-junkie. How big a news junkie? I read the newspapers online at one in the morning, when the next day’s articles get posted. And I found I had interesting thoughts about different things, and wanted to write about them, and have people read what I wrote.

It’s because I finished my novel. I had to stop writing my blog while I did that, but afterwards I found I had nothing to write. And so I wrote nothing.

It’s because I got cybersquatted! My domain and hosting lapsed, and I didn’t bother to renew. I figured nobody else would want nicholascarvan.com, but I was wrong. A fuckhead Russian named Sergei snapped it up for its pagerank and inbound links, and also as a crude form of extortion. It now advertises rape porn and “real incest videos”. It shocks people who aren’t easily shocked. Sergei would like me to buy it back from him. Sergei can wait till hell freezes over. Hence the new domain.

It’s because I got sick of people saying to me, “Hey, I went to your blog to look at old article x, and now I want to burn out my eyeballs.”

It’s because I got sick of people saying to me, “Hey, do you have, um, a new business?”

It’s because I wanted to reclaim my name from pornographers.

It’s because I kept having ideas for blog entries.

It’s because random net people were upset that they couldn’t find my fonts anymore.

It’s because random net people were upset that they couldn’t find a certain article anymore.

It’s because I found I was proud of some of the things that I had written on here, and thought they should still be available.

It’s because I went out doing parkour with Tim the other day. We were both hopeless, of course, but I did one thing that was kind of cool. And I fell on my ass a few times in idiotic fashion. And a part of me whispered “You could do this in a superhero costume. And film it. And then put it on the internet! Ahahahaha.”

A few administrative notes:

* I imagine that this blog will be now be more political and news-based than it has been in the past. Although there will probably still be the occasional personal story, it will not be the main focus.

* The archives are back up. Most of the photos are missing, and I can’t guarantee that there aren’t still some internal links that will take you to the porn site. I’m in the process of going back through the old entries, taking some down and fixing up problems, but it will take a while.

* I seem to have lost borzoi woman; meet the mermaid. I don’t know, it now seems a bit girlish? I may need a redesign.

* It feels good to be back?

Aug
03

asterisk Winter asterisk

At the end of April, I closed Plup.

At the start of May, I closed my blog. I was no longer sure why I wrote it. I felt guilty when I didn’t update it. I felt disapointed in myself when I wrote it badly. Sometimes, when something happened or an interesting thought occurred to me, I could gather myself to write something that I thought was OK, and then I became anxious about what other people thought of it. The closure of the shop had taken me out of the public eye, and I wanted to hide for a while, rediscover the other me. Running the shop had left me run-down, I felt robotic and bland, I didn’t recognise myself.

I was good for a while. I wrote a thousand words of my novel a day. I felt that what I was writing was not very good, but I kept on.

I stopped writing a thousand words a day. I had a good excuse, the first couple of days, and on other days I still made an effort. Then my excuses became justifications, told to nobody but myself. I stopped doing my exercises. The habits that I had built up over three years of running the shop, habits that I might think of, charitably, as economies of energy, or in another mood I might just call laziness, started to come back. I didn’t do proper grocery shopping, my place started to get reprehensibly filthy again.

The weather turned. Winter hit. The weather was horrible, rainy and cold. I didn’t want to go outside.

On June 8th, in the midst of severe storms, the MV Pasha Bulker, a 76,000 tonne deadweight Panamax bulk carrier, was washed ashore on Nobby’s Beach in Newcastle. The ships anchored off Newcastle had been warned of the coming storm and told to move out to sea. The Pasha Bulker was one of ten ships that ignored the warning. It was blown ashore with a fully operational engine room and both anchors stored in the hawsepipes. It was as large as the beach itself. The images on the news fascinated me; it seemed a surreal sight, this huge bulk carrier, massively out of scale with the beach, stranded a few metres offshore.

On June 12th, I turned thirty-one. The digits depressed me. The extra syllable seemed to carry so much weight. I wasn’t happy with what I had achieved in my life. I had meant to organize to do something to celebrate, but there were lots of other things on, and I didn’t get around to it. I went out to dinner with my father. Tim, good friend that he is, called me up – “did you say you wanted to go to trivia for your birthday?” I had mentioned something about this, but had done nothing to let anyone know. So I went to trivia with Tim. Against much larger teams, we finished third, one place out of the money.

I never did become unsociable, perhaps because I had been so concious of the need to continue to see people. I continued to see people – I think I was even bright and cheerful.

I went to see my oldest friend, Ben. Michael Chabon, riffing off Cervantes, said something about male friendships in Wonder Boys that always reminds me of Ben. He said, “All male friendships are essentially quixotic: they last only so long as each man is willing to polish the shaving-bowl helmet, climb on his donkey, and ride off after the other in pursuit of illusive glory and questionable adventure.” I don’t know if it’s true of all male friendships, but it’s true of me and Ben – which is all a fancy way of saying that he’s always been a bad influence on me, and vice versa. If it wasn’t for Ben, I probably never would have drunk a glass of mortar-and-pestled morning glory flowers suspended in orange juice (we were supposed to collect the stamens, but got bored. It didn’t work.) And it was a particularly memorable night out with me that caused him to re-assess his life and decide to get married.

This time wasn’t so spectacular, but Ben showed me internet poker. It appealed to me, the combination of gambling and on-the-fly calculations of probability. I wanted to get good at it, I wanted to beat the house percentage. I spent hours on this. I got OK at it, but never really good. It wasn’t about the money – I deposited fifty dollars, the minimum the site allowed. My fifty dollar deposit reached a high point of one hundred and seventy-three dollars, but I pissed it all away eventually. That didn’t bother me, and still doesn’t – it was an intellectual exercise, and I was prepared to lose my fifty bucks. But, see, I was OK at it. So I lost my money very slowly. And I spent a lot of time on it – it was addictive, and every time I thought I had it worked out I would lose when I should not have, and it would make me want to try again. It was a scuzzy way to waste my time, when I should have been writing, but I couldn’t seem to stop. I didn’t quite lose the last of my money deliberately – I never stopped trying to win – but I was relieved when I finally lost the last of it.

Meanwhile, the weather was still horrible, I wasn’t writing much, and I was obsessed with the efforts to refloat the Pasha Bulker. I wanted it to fail, I wanted it to stay marooned off Nobby’s Beach forever, I wanted it to rust into the landscape. In some way I couldn’t quite understand, I identified with the Pasha Bulker. I wasn’t alone. It became a tourist attraction – supposedly half a million people visited it. The salvage company seemed inept – the first attempt to refloat it went awry, the cables connecting it to the tugboats kept snapping. Later, it was alleged that the anchors had been left down during the first salvage attempt, which was why the cables snapped – who knows if it was true? There were spurious environmental concerns, there were worries of an oil leak – but why weren’t the fuel tanks drained? I heard others ask this question, eventually, but I never heard the answer. (Counter-intuitively, shipwrecks are actually good for ocean biodiversity, they form artificial reefs. But some people just hate the idea of man-made things in a “natural” environment.)

The bookselling business wasn’t going well. I couldn’t understand why. I had thought I would be making lots of money, but my bank account was empty. I had made the mistake of thinking only of grosses, and had roughly subtracted expenses in my head, when I should have sat down with pen and paper and worked it out properly. It turns out I spend a lot more money than I thought I did – on the business, and on my own living expenses. There were things I could do about this, but I seemed incapable of doing them. I had been struck by a sort of paralysis. I don’t know what it is in me that makes me so lazy sometimes. It always makes me feel bad about myself, and I don’t enjoy it, so why do I do it? I don’t know.

My friend Vanessa’s book, Strawberry Hills Forever, came out, and I went to her book launch. I wore a tie and a snappy outfit. I don’t think I was envious of her – certainly she deserved it – but it made me concious of my own failures. If I was envious of anything, I think it was the effort her publishers made to promote her book. My own publisher never did anything much on mine. Her book, a compilation of her zine writings, is really good, and you should all get a copy, if you haven’t already. In concept, it sounded like an anthology, and I wondered how the zine pieces would hold up in bound form and seperated from the context of zines. I shouldn’t have worried – somehow Vanessa structured and contextualized it in such a way that it reads more like a sort of patchwork memoir, each part contributing to a unified whole.

I guess my feelings on it are a little complex, because there was a time when none of us had published anything other than in zines, and I felt that Vanessa and Tim were my writing contemporaries, they were the people who were serious and talented and who I could talk to about writing, the sort of people I had thought I would meet in my writing course, but never did. And I’d talk to Vanessa and we would spin these verbal fantasies of our successes. And I had a book published first, and then things went awry somehow – I wrote a novel that was crap, I got depressed, I got sidetracked with Plup – and meanwhile Vanessa worked really hard at her writing – and one day I realized that she had gotten much, much, better than I was. Her writing was probably always more appealing to people than mine is, but I felt I had some edge on her in things like style and structure and the like. No longer. Her most recent zine is full of things that are as good or better than anything in her book, and are way better than anything I have managed to write. Well, everybody always knew Vanessa was the real talent… (Actually, Tim is the real talent. I tell him he’s Mozart to the rest of our Salieri. When you read Tim’s stuff, you feel like he’s concious of the etymological history of every word he uses.)

I was getting frustrated with myself, I was starting to dislike myself. My failures as a human being kept suprising me. There was a guy at my local service station called Jugdish. Whenever I went over there, he never said please, or thank you, or any other such civility. I responded by being equally taciturn, never thanking him, or saying please. Forgetting how rude I was, on occasions, in my own retail career, it started to really bug me. He would hand me my change, and I would take it, and I would stand there expectantly, my eyebrows raised, a supercillious look on my face. He would say nothing. I would give a little nod, then turn and leave. One day, I wasn’t sure of the totals of what I was buying, and the register was obscured. I asked him the price. He mumbled something I couldn’t hear. “What was that?” I asked.

“F-f-f-f-f-fourteen t-t-t-t-t-t-t-twenty,” he responed, in the most horrible stutter I have ever encountered.

I stood there, and lots of thoughts went through my mind. How horrible it must be to work in a service station. How horrible it would be to work in retail with a really bad stutter. No wonder he never said please, or thank you, can you imagine the hell of it? I paid him. “Thanks,” I said.

I had an argument with a customer. I hadn’t done that in a long time. This old duffer rang up, and I guess the details aren’t important, but he was claiming a book was coming up as sold on our website. Which is impossible – it’s either for sale, or it’s not on there. But he was insisting that our website told him it was sold. And instead of just collecting his credit card details and sending him the book, I decided, for god knows what reason, to debate the point. “I find you very hard to deal with,” he said, after a bit.

And I caught myself again. I thought of my own phone phobia, and anxiety about calling call centres, and how grateful I am when they are polite and helpful, and how I always fear they will act the way I was acting – contemptuously, disputing details, being unhelpful. What the fuck was I doing? What did it matter whether this guy, who sounded about seventy, could work and understand our website? I took his details and got off the phone and wondered what was wrong with me.

I could go on with this, more anecdotes illustrating the same basic point, but I won’t. Anyway, a couple of weeks ago, I started feeling strange. Sort of melancholic and open and disapointed with myself at the same time. I took a look at my novel – somehow, despite not writing as often as I should have, I had about twenty thousand words. It was, I realized, pretty awful, but for the first time I could see what was wrong with it. Somehow I had gotten in the habit of positioning myself, narratively and metaphorically speaking, about two feet above and behind the head of my protagonist. It’s a somewhat ninteenth century style, where Thackeray would say, for instance, something like “Young Barry Lyndon had, as a fundamental aspect of his temperament, a curious lack of inhibition when it came to ejaculations.” I made that up. The point is, I wasn’t inside my characters, and it made everything far more expository than it should be – and exposition is always boring – and everything felt remote and quirky.

This feeling, I realised, wasn’t that foreign to me, I just hadn’t felt it in a long time. The emotional openness, the melancholy, the introspection, the ambition and the disapointment in myself – I used to feel like this a lot, back before I became numb. It’s not a great feeling, but it is a feeling, and it is closer to what I think of as my natural self.

I complained to my father. I said I didn’t know what I was doing or where I was going. I felt stagnant. He said I needed to figure out what I wanted, then figure out how to achieve it. I said I knew what I wanted. “I want to write a novel that moves people, I want to go overseas, I want to have experiences that I can write about, I want to push myself out of my comfort zone, I want to be productive, I want to matter.”

I chucked my novel, and started again, and it’s gone a lot better, so far. I have five thousand words, two characters I care about, and a good first chapter. Somebody once asked me what I thought was the best mood in which to write, and I said to them, “Have you ever been up late at night, overtired and a little emotional, and reached a point where a newsclip about somebody achieving something in some sport you don’t even care about brought you to the edge of tears?” I feel like that a lot, these days.

Anyway, I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s not best for me to live my life completely out of the public gaze. A certain amount of scrutiny keeps me accountable, if only to myself. So I might write on this blog, sometimes, if I have something I want to say. Gem, you were right, these things are like children, we come back to them.

May
06

asterisk The end asterisk

In fiction, I think I’m not too bad at endings, but in real life I’m not so good at them. I tend to use up my emotions prematurely, or else push on long past when I should have stopped. I never got my finishing end with Plup – there were too many small endings, and eventually I became stupid with them, announcing loudly my last ever spilling of coffee and my last trip to the toilet. By the time I closed the door for the last time the shop no longer felt like the shop to me, with the bare walls and large empty windows and far too much space, and I didn’t feel much at all, although I tried hard to feel something.

I probably should have ended this blog back in February when I finished my series of seriously-written blog entries. I thought about it, and had half-intended to do so, but then I’d enjoyed writing them, and thought I’d found a way to write this blog that I liked, and that was good, and that I felt comfortable with. Still, it hasn’t quite worked out that way, and I seem to have slipped back into old habits with frivolous entries and irregular updates.

On reflection, I really see no reason why my life needs to be on the internet. It’s funny, I’ve done this blog for nearly four years now, but never much questioned why I do it. I suppose in retrospect there were a few reasons – it was a reaching-out to people, and provided an ersatz surrogate for the diary I’d stopped keeping a short while before I started this, and it made me feel I was at least writing something. Things are different now. I’m working hard on my novel – it goes slowly, and I’m not entirely happy with it, but then it’s not meant to be easy. Recently I’ve started keeping a diary again. My life has come naturally to a juncture; I am keen, generally, to make changes; something has to give, and I think it has to be this blog.

This is something I have thought about for a long time now; it’s not a momentary whim of mood. For every good reason I have for continuing this thing, I have an equally good reason for stopping. It allows me to stay in touch with people, but at the same time, as I pointed out accusatively once before, and now note without rancour, I think it does provide people with a superficial feeling that they are in touch with me when they really are not, or only occasionally are. It does encourage me to write on a regular basis, but it also encourages me to be less vigilant about the quality of what I send into the world. In the end I am a self-concious person, not particularly inclined to public demonstration, and I find at least half the things I write on here I end up regretting. Although I am cautious of how much I reveal here, the accumulation of information I provide is something with which I am uncomfortable, and leaves me feeling overexposed. Still, the main reason is simply that I want to spend my writing time working on my novel, and now that I find myself seriously engaged with the process of writing it, time spent doing this blog feels like a waste.

For these reasons and others I have decided to discontinue this blog. The nature of this sort of blog announcement being what it is, it would be stupid of me to say unequivocably that I will never again want to write this blog, or some other, but I really think I’ve had enough. Thank you all for reading. Thank you for the comments, which always meant a lot, and sometimes meant much more than could possibly have been imagined by the commenter. A short reminder of what is obvious – just because I don’t have a blog, it doesn’t mean I have ceased to exist, and should anybody be curious, I can still be found quite easily at the other end of a telephone line or internet connection.

Thanks and goodbye.